Mientras que mi web professional muestra las obras de mi despacho como arquitecto, este blog recopila documentación sobre una serie de actividades que desarrollo en paralelo a él. El ejercicio internacional de la profesión, las entidades entorno a las que se organizan los arquitectos o la reflexión sobre los modos de intervención en la ciudad constituyen los principales puntos de atención, al tiempo que se facilita el acceso a una serie de enlaces relacionados.

Moscow and Krasta streets.



Moscow district is a 32 000 inhabitants neighbourhood quite close to Riga's city centre with a powerful identity and a rich wooden architecture heritage. It is just a few meters away from the Daugava river, has a lot of greenery, many squares and parks, several schools, a University complex, and quite a characteristic atmosphere. Many of the inhabitants have been living there over generations and simply love the place.

It is however poorly linked with the neighbouring areas, with several physical barriers cutting it off from the rest of the city. It has also lost contact with the river front, has many abandoned properties, a significant lack of services and cultural activities, no attractiveness for potential visitors, an unfriendly pedestrian environment, and a very high rate of unemployment.

It is one of the five areas targeted for redevelopment at the RadiRigu! workshops. 

The proposal for this area centred on two main streets as a way to revamp the whole neighbourhood. Moscow street is the backbone of the area and was the main traffic link between the city centre and the South-East. When Krasta street opened as an alternative free way next to the river, Moscow street role changed dramatically and, with it, the whole character of the neighbourhood. Working on both streets is an attempt to rebalance the situation, revitalize the very heart of the district and reorganize its waterfront.

Moscow street is foreseen as a slow traffic street, devoted to public trams and bicycle paths. Its may well channel, in a sustainable way, over 88 000 people -who live either at the Moscow district itself or at the neighbouring Kengarags district- towards the city centre. It extends the intended cycling system in Riga to a whole new area and allows for easy access to 45 educational centres. Services related to the students and the potential cycling tourism to its many wooden constructions may become the basis for a new economy in the area.

Krasta street is currently a fast traffic access that disregards the importance of the neighbouring district and the potential of the waterfront. It constitutes a strong barrier between the city and the river and consumes a significant amount of land. But the number of existing traffic lanes can be reduced without affecting the overall traffic scheme and the beltway transformed into a city boulevard. Over 20 ha could then be devoted to new public spaces along the waterfront and bring new activities and new businesses into a now beautiful but deserted area.




Project team: Ventis Didrihsons, Ilze Circene, Jānis Barkāns, Vita Jevdokimova, Sabīne Zāģere.


4 comentarios:

  1. Mohammed recomienda esto.

    ResponderEliminar
  2. Interesanti! I like the orientation to neighborhood-serving streets and the redevelopment potential of downsizing street. Taking advantage of the Daugava makes sense too. Any concerns about losing the character which had likely been preserved because of the relative isolation?

    ResponderEliminar
  3. This is an interesting question and certainly one of the challenges of the proposed plan. A good balance between renovation and mantainance of the existing character is certainly a must.

    ResponderEliminar
  4. Most certainly. I've been traveling to Riga since 1990 and have noted the city's continued evolution. What struck me in 2010 were improvements to pedestrian amenities but also dramatic changes to iconic Riga-scapes; specifically the skyline which for centuries was defined be the church spires of Old Riga but no is altered by the introduction of modern, taller structures. Seems that there is need for a strong urban design ethic that respects the past while looking to the future.

    ResponderEliminar