Moscow
district is a 32 000 inhabitants neighbourhood quite close to Riga's
city centre with a powerful identity and a rich wooden architecture
heritage. It is just a few meters away from the Daugava river, has a
lot of greenery, many squares and parks, several schools, a
University complex, and quite a characteristic atmosphere. Many of
the inhabitants have been living there over generations and simply
love the place.
It
is however poorly linked with the neighbouring areas, with several
physical barriers cutting it off from the rest of the city. It has
also lost contact with the river front, has many abandoned
properties, a significant lack of services and cultural activities,
no attractiveness for potential visitors, an unfriendly pedestrian
environment, and a very high rate of unemployment.
Moscow street is foreseen as a slow traffic street, devoted to public trams and bicycle paths. Its may well channel, in a sustainable way, over 88 000 people -who live either at the Moscow district itself or at the neighbouring Kengarags district- towards the city centre. It extends the intended cycling system in Riga to a whole new area and allows for easy access to 45 educational centres. Services related to the students and the potential cycling tourism to its many wooden constructions may become the basis for a new economy in the area.
Krasta
street is currently a fast traffic access that disregards the
importance of the neighbouring district and the potential of the
waterfront. It constitutes a strong barrier between the city and the
river and consumes a significant amount of land. But the number of
existing traffic lanes can be reduced without affecting the overall
traffic scheme and the beltway transformed into a city boulevard.
Over 20 ha could then be devoted to new public spaces along the
waterfront and bring new activities and new businesses into a now
beautiful but deserted area.
Project team: Ventis Didrihsons, Ilze Circene, Jānis Barkāns, Vita Jevdokimova, Sabīne Zāģere.
Mohammed recomienda esto.
ResponderEliminarInteresanti! I like the orientation to neighborhood-serving streets and the redevelopment potential of downsizing street. Taking advantage of the Daugava makes sense too. Any concerns about losing the character which had likely been preserved because of the relative isolation?
ResponderEliminarThis is an interesting question and certainly one of the challenges of the proposed plan. A good balance between renovation and mantainance of the existing character is certainly a must.
ResponderEliminarMost certainly. I've been traveling to Riga since 1990 and have noted the city's continued evolution. What struck me in 2010 were improvements to pedestrian amenities but also dramatic changes to iconic Riga-scapes; specifically the skyline which for centuries was defined be the church spires of Old Riga but no is altered by the introduction of modern, taller structures. Seems that there is need for a strong urban design ethic that respects the past while looking to the future.
ResponderEliminar